<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>NLU on NotNil Blog</title><link>https://notnil.org/en/tags/nlu/</link><description>Recent content in NLU on NotNil Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>© Matthieu Moreau</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 May 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://notnil.org/en/tags/nlu/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The seawall</title><link>https://notnil.org/en/posts/12-digue/</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://notnil.org/en/posts/12-digue/</guid><description>&lt;figure&gt;&lt;img src="https://notnil.org/images/posts/digue/digue_feature.jpg" width="800"&gt;&lt;figcaption&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;h4&gt;the seawall&lt;/h4&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&lt;/figcaption&gt;&#10;&lt;/figure&gt;&#10;&#10;&lt;p&gt;OK. I&amp;rsquo;m pretty passionate about, and fascinated by, what&amp;rsquo;s happening with LLMs since GPT-4 (so as not to use another term).&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;My position is that the coding assistants built with LLMs are going to have a monstrous impact on the way we produce software. By monstrous, I mean the end of the shortage of (good) developers, with at least a 30% drop in demand. Why that number? It&amp;rsquo;s what I can see in the productivity gain of a developer who uses an LLM tool in their production (and it&amp;rsquo;s the low end announced by every Amazon/Google/Microsoft for their code-specialized LLMs).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>